PDF Viewer

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

MVP Investment

$10K - $14K
6-10 weeks
Engineering
$8,000
GPU Compute
$800
LLM API Credits
$500
SaaS Stack
$300
Domain & Legal
$100

6mo ROI

0.5-1x

3yr ROI

6-15x

GPU-heavy products have higher costs but premium pricing. Expect break-even by 12mo, then 40%+ margins at scale.

Talent Scout

N

Nicholas Santavas

eBay

K

Kareem Eissa

eBay

P

Patrycja Cieplicka

eBay

P

Piotr Florek

eBay

Find Similar Experts

LLM experts on LinkedIn & GitHub

References (32)

[1]
A Survey on Inference Engines for Large Language Models: Perspectives on Optimization and Efficiency
2025Sihyeong Park, Sungryeol Jeon et al.
[2]
SelectQ: Calibration Data Selection for Post-training Quantization
2025Zhao Zhang, Yangcheng Gao et al.
[3]
Taming the Titans: A Survey of Efficient LLM Inference Serving
2025Ranran Zhen, Juntao Li et al.
[4]
High-Throughput LLM inference on Heterogeneous Clusters
2025Yi Xiong, Jinqi Huang et al.
[5]
Towards End-to-End Optimization of LLM-based Applications with Ayo
2025Xin Tan, Yimin Jiang et al.
[6]
SCOOT: SLO-Oriented Performance Tuning for LLM Inference Engines
2024Ke Cheng, Zhi Wang et al.
[7]
Outliers and Calibration Sets have Diminishing Effect on Quantization of Modern LLMs
2024Davide Paglieri, Saurabh Dash et al.
[8]
A Survey on Efficient Inference for Large Language Models
2024Zixuan Zhou, Xuefei Ning et al.
[9]
Model Compression and Efficient Inference for Large Language Models: A Survey
2024Wenxiao Wang, Wei Chen et al.
[10]
Faster and Lighter LLMs: A Survey on Current Challenges and Way Forward
2024Arnav Chavan, Raghav Magazine et al.
[11]
Do-Not-Answer: Evaluating Safeguards in LLMs
2024Yuxia Wang, Haonan Li et al.
[12]
SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programs
2023Lianmin Zheng, Liangsheng Yin et al.
[13]
On the Impact of Calibration Data in Post-training Quantization and Pruning
2023Miles Williams, Nikolaos Aletras
[14]
Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Models
2023Jeffrey Zhou, Tianjian Lu et al.
[15]
Dynamic Sparse No Training: Training-Free Fine-tuning for Sparse LLMs
2023Yu-xin Zhang, Lirui Zhao et al.
[16]
Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention
2023Woosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li et al.
[17]
A Survey on Model Compression for Large Language Models
2023Xunyu Zhu, Jian Li et al.
[18]
A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Models
2023Mingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu et al.
[19]
SpQR: A Sparse-Quantized Representation for Near-Lossless LLM Weight Compression
2023Tim Dettmers, Ruslan Svirschevski et al.
[20]
LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Models
2023Xinyin Ma, Gongfan Fang et al.

Showing 20 of 32 references

Founder's Pitch

"OptiKIT automates LLM optimization to save time and resources for enterprises by enhancing GPU throughput and enabling AI scalability."

LLM OptimizationScore: 9View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

2/4 signals

5

Quick Build

2/4 signals

5

Series A Potential

4/4 signals

10

Sources used for this analysis

arXiv Paper

Full-text PDF analysis of the research paper

GitHub Repository

Code availability, stars, and contributor activity

Citation Network

Semantic Scholar citations and co-citation patterns

Community Predictions

Crowd-sourced unicorn probability assessments

Analysis model: GPT-4o · Last scored: 1/28/2026

🔭 Research Neighborhood

Generating constellation...

~3-8 seconds

Why It Matters

OptiKIT addresses the significant challenge of scaling large language model (LLM) deployments in enterprises where compute resources and specialized expertise are limited. By automating complex optimization workflows, it empowers non-experts to achieve significant performance improvements, making AI initiatives more scalable and cost-effective.

Product Angle

To productize OptiKIT, develop a subscription-based SaaS platform offering the tool as an optimization pipeline addon for enterprise machine learning teams, integrating with popular ML cloud services and on-prem deployments.

Disruption

OptiKIT has the potential to disrupt existing AI optimization services and platforms that require significant manual intervention, such as NVIDIA's TensorRT-Sweep or Neural Magic's offerings, by removing human expertise as a bottleneck.

Product Opportunity

There is a substantial opportunity within tech-driven enterprises facing high computational costs due to large LLM deployments. Organizations like eBay are ideal customers, where AI feature rollout needs to be cost-effective yet performant. Potential customers will pay for optimization as a service to improve throughput and reduce costs.

Use Case Idea

OptiKIT can be used by large tech companies to improve the efficiency of machine learning pipelines, enhancing model serving speed and reducing computational costs, thus enabling broader AI feature deployment without scaling infrastructure costs linearly.

Science

OptiKIT is a distributed system designed to optimize large language models (LLMs) in enterprise settings. It automates model compression and tuning steps that were traditionally manual and expertise-intensive. The framework orchestrates GPU resources dynamically, runs distributed pipeline executions, and seamlessly integrates with enterprise infrastructures. It features backend-agnostic design, a recipe-based configuration system for dynamic tuning, and a statistical evaluation library to ensure optimized models meet performance standards.

Method & Eval

OptiKIT was tested in production at eBay, achieving more than a 2x improvement in GPU throughput. It uses dynamic allocation of resources and pipeline orchestration to achieve optimal model performance. Benchmarking and case studies within eBay demonstrate its efficacy by significant throughput gains and latency reductions.

Caveats

The solution might face challenges in diverse hardware environments, requiring further tuning for specific cases and may not entirely circumvent all data privacy concerns associated with cloud integrations. It relies on consistent resource availability and highly interconnected infrastructures, which may not be universal across potential clients.

Author Intelligence

Nicholas Santavas

eBay
nsantavas@ebay.com

Kareem Eissa

eBay

Patrycja Cieplicka

eBay

Piotr Florek

eBay

Matteo Nulli

eBay

Stefan Vasilev

eBay

Seyyed Hadi Hashemi

eBay

Antonios Gasteratos

Democritus University of Thrace

Shahram Khadivi

eBay