PDF Viewer

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

References (35)

[1]
CryptoBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Expert-Level Evaluation of LLM Agents in Cryptocurrency
2025Jiacheng Guo, Suozhi Huang et al.
[2]
When Hallucination Costs Millions: Benchmarking AI Agents in High-Stakes Adversarial Financial Markets
2025Zeshi Dai, Zimo Peng et al.
[3]
Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey
2025Mahmoud Mohammadi, Yipeng Li et al.
[4]
Evaluating Scoring Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge
2025Qingquan Li, Shaoyu Dou et al.
[5]
DRAGged into Conflicts: Detecting and Addressing Conflicting Sources in Search-Augmented LLMs
2025Arie Cattan, Alon Jacovi et al.
[6]
CiteEval: Principle-Driven Citation Evaluation for Source Attribution
2025Yumo Xu, Peng Qi et al.
[7]
Finance Agent Benchmark: Benchmarking LLMs on Real-world Financial Research Tasks
2025Antoine Bigeard, Langston Nashold et al.
[8]
DMind Benchmark: Toward a Holistic Assessment of LLM Capabilities across the Web3 Domain
2025Enhao Huang, Pengyu Sun et al.
[9]
BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents
2025Jason Wei, Zhiqing Sun et al.
[10]
INVESTORBENCH: A Benchmark for Financial Decision-Making Tasks with LLM-based Agent
2025Haohang Li, Yupeng Cao et al.
[11]
LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods
2024Haitao Li, Qian Dong et al.
[12]
Self-Preference Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge
2024Koki Wataoka, Tsubasa Takahashi et al.
[13]
Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judge
2024Jiayi Ye, Yanbo Wang et al.
[14]
WikiContradict: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Real-World Knowledge Conflicts from Wikipedia
2024Yufang Hou, Alessandra Pascale et al.
[15]
From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline
2024Tianle Li, Wei-Lin Chiang et al.
[16]
Judging the Judges: A Systematic Study of Position Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge
2024Lin Shi, Chiyu Ma et al.
[17]
Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluators
2024Yann Dubois, Bal'azs Galambosi et al.
[18]
How well do LLMs cite relevant medical references? An evaluation framework and analyses
2024Kevin Wu, Eric Wu et al.
[19]
What Do the Regulators Mean? A Taxonomy of Regulatory Principles for the Use of AI in Financial Services
2024Mustafa Pamuk, Matthias Schumann et al.
[20]
CryptoTrade: A Reflective LLM-based Agent to Guide Zero-shot Cryptocurrency Trading
2024Yuan Li, B. Luo et al.

Showing 20 of 35 references

Founder's Pitch

"Develop a robust benchmark and evaluation tool for LLMs in the crypto analysis domain to improve accuracy in high-stakes decision making."

LLM EvaluationScore: 7View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

1/4 signals

2.5

Quick Build

3/4 signals

7.5

Series A Potential

3/4 signals

7.5

Sources used for this analysis

arXiv Paper

Full-text PDF analysis of the research paper

GitHub Repository

Code availability, stars, and contributor activity

Citation Network

Semantic Scholar citations and co-citation patterns

Community Predictions

Crowd-sourced unicorn probability assessments

Analysis model: GPT-4o · Last scored: 2/11/2026

Explore the full citation network and related research.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Get detailed profiles of the research team.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.