View PDF ↗
PDF Viewer

Loading PDF...

This may take a moment

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Core Pattern

AI-generated implementation pattern based on this paper's core methodology.

Implementation pattern included in full analysis above.

MVP Investment

$9K - $13K
6-10 weeks
Engineering
$8,000
GPU Compute
$800
SaaS Stack
$300
Domain & Legal
$100

6mo ROI

0.5-1x

3yr ROI

6-15x

GPU-heavy products have higher costs but premium pricing. Expect break-even by 12mo, then 40%+ margins at scale.

Talent Scout

I

Itamar Mishani

Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University

M

Maxim Likhachev

Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University

Find Similar Experts

Robotic experts on LinkedIn & GitHub

Founder's Pitch

"Multi-Graph Search (MGS) enhances high-dimensional robot motion planning efficiency using multi-graph techniques."

Robotic Motion PlanningScore: 6View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

3/4 signals

7.5

Quick Build

4/4 signals

10

Series A Potential

4/4 signals

10

🔭 Research Neighborhood

Generating constellation...

~3-8 seconds

Why It Matters

As robots are increasingly deployed in real-world applications with high-dimensional state spaces, efficient and reliable motion planning becomes crucial. The Multi-Graph Search (MGS) algorithm addresses these needs by incorporating a multi-graph approach that offers both scalability and consistency in motion planning by focusing search efforts on promising regions.

Product Angle

Turning this research into a product could involve a software package for industrial robots, enabling them to autonomously navigate complex environments more efficiently. This could reduce both the time and cost associated with setting up and maintaining robotic systems.

Disruption

This approach could replace or enhance existing motion planning solutions that rely on traditional sampling-based or search-based techniques, offering a more consistent and efficient alternative for environments that require dynamic maneuvering and high reliability.

Product Opportunity

The market for industrial automation is rapidly expanding, with robotics projected to play a critical role in manufacturing, logistics, and more. Companies deploying robotic solutions would benefit from improved motion planning algorithms that can lower setup costs and enhance operational efficiency, presenting a compelling product-market fit.

Use Case Idea

Develop an industrial robot path-planning software that utilizes Multi-Graph Search to enable rapid deployment of mobile manipulators in warehouses, optimizing their pathfinding capabilities for obstacle-dense environments.

Science

The Multi-Graph Search (MGS) algorithm employs a novel approach to motion planning by expanding multiple implicit graphs simultaneously instead of a single one. This method allows the algorithm to concentrate on high-potential areas of the state space while ensuring that initially disconnected subgraphs merge through feasible transitions. It keeps the problem tractable in high-dimensional spaces by balancing search completeness and bounded suboptimality.

Method & Eval

The method involved simulation experiments and real-world tests where the MGS algorithm was applied to manipulation and mobile manipulation tasks. Comparisons showed that MGS required significantly less search effort than traditional methods like Weighted-A*, highlighting its efficiency and reliability through empirical evaluations.

Caveats

One potential limitation could be the computational overhead associated with maintaining and expanding multiple graphs, although this is mitigated by the algorithm's structure. Additionally, the effectiveness of MGS in environments substantially different from those tested could vary, requiring further validation.

Author Intelligence

Itamar Mishani

Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
imishani@cs.cmu.edu

Maxim Likhachev

Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
maxim@cs.cmu.edu

References (57)

[1]
SRMP: Search-Based Robot Motion Planning Library
2025Itamar Mishani, Yorai Shaoul et al.
[2]
Attractor-based Closed List Search: Sparsifying the Closed List for Efficient Memory-Constrained Planning
2025Alvin Zou, Muhammad Suhail Saleem et al.
[3]
A biconvex method for minimum-time motion planning through sequences of convex sets
2025Tobia Marcucci, Mathew Halm et al.
[4]
Anchor Search: A Unified Framework for Suboptimal Bidirectional Search
2025Sepehr Lavasani, Lior Siag et al.
[5]
Neural MP: A Generalist Neural Motion Planner
2024Murtaza Dalal, Jiahui Yang et al.
[6]
Unconstraining Multi-Robot Manipulation: Enabling Arbitrary Constraints in ECBS with Bounded Sub-Optimality
2024Yorai Shaoul, Rishi Veerapaneni et al.
[7]
Accelerating Search-Based Planning for Multi-Robot Manipulation by Leveraging Online-Generated Experiences
2024Yorai Shaoul, Itamar Mishani et al.
[8]
Constant-time Motion Planning with Anytime Refinement for Manipulation
2023Itamar Mishani, Hayden Feddock et al.
[9]
Sampling-Based Motion Planning: A Comparative Review
2023A. Orthey, Constantinos Chamzas et al.
[10]
Motion Planning Diffusion: Learning and Planning of Robot Motions with Diffusion Models
2023João Carvalho, An T. Le et al.
[11]
Landmark Progression in Heuristic Search
2023Clemens Büchner, Thomas Keller et al.
[12]
Interactive Imitation Learning in Robotics: A Survey
2022C. Celemin, Rodrigo P'erez-Dattari et al.
[13]
Multi-Tree Guided Efficient Robot Motion Planning
2022Zhi-Qiang Sun, Jiankun Wang et al.
[14]
Scaling-up Generalized Planning as Heuristic Search with Landmarks
2022Javier Segovia Aguas, Sergio Jiménez Celorrio et al.
[15]
Motion planning around obstacles with convex optimization
2022Tobia Marcucci, Mark E. Petersen et al.
[16]
MotionBenchMaker: A Tool to Generate and Benchmark Motion Planning Datasets
2021Constantinos Chamzas, Carlos Quintero-Peña et al.
[17]
Generating Options and Choosing Between Them Depend on Distinct Forms of Value Representation
2021Adam Morris, Jonathan Phillips et al.
[18]
Skill Discovery for Exploration and Planning using Deep Skill Graphs
2021Akhil Bagaria, J. Senthil et al.
[19]
Search on the Replay Buffer: Bridging Planning and Reinforcement Learning
2019Benjamin Eysenbach, R. Salakhutdinov et al.
[20]
Provable Indefinite-Horizon Real-Time Planning for Repetitive Tasks
2019Fahad Islam, Oren Salzman et al.

Showing 20 of 57 references