View PDF ↗
PDF Viewer

Loading PDF...

This may take a moment

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Core Pattern

AI-generated implementation pattern based on this paper's core methodology.

Implementation pattern included in full analysis above.

MVP Investment

$10K - $13K
6-10 weeks
Engineering
$8,000
Cloud Hosting
$240
SaaS Stack
$800
Domain & Legal
$500

6mo ROI

2-4x

3yr ROI

10-20x

Lightweight AI tools can reach profitability quickly. At $500/mo average contract, 20 customers = $10K MRR by 6mo, 200+ by 3yr.

Talent Scout

Y

Yiran Gao

City University of Hong Kong

K

Kim Hammar

University of Melbourne

T

Tao Li

City University of Hong Kong

Find Similar Experts

Autonomous experts on LinkedIn & GitHub

Founder's Pitch

"An end-to-end LLM agent for faster and smarter autonomous network incident response."

Autonomous CybersecurityScore: 8View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

2/4 signals

5

Quick Build

4/4 signals

10

Series A Potential

4/4 signals

10

🔭 Research Neighborhood

Generating constellation...

~3-8 seconds

Why It Matters

The research provides an innovative approach to automating network incident response, which is crucial as cyberattacks become more sophisticated and frequent, requiring rapid adaptation and real-time decision-making that current manual systems cannot achieve.

Product Angle

The technology can be productized as a software solution that integrates with existing cybersecurity systems to automate the incident response process. It would simplify and accelerate the response to cyber threats, avoiding the need for extensive manual intervention.

Disruption

The solution could replace manual incident response teams in terms of speed and potentially accuracy, providing continuous monitoring and rapid response to cyber incidents, thus reducing the need for large manual efforts in threat mitigation.

Product Opportunity

With cybersecurity spending on the rise, reaching $172 billion in 2022, there is immense market potential, especially for a tool that reduces manual security operations. Enterprises and governments with critical infrastructure are likely to invest in tools that accelerate incident response while maintaining security integrity.

Use Case Idea

Develop a commercial product for network security teams to automate incident response, reducing recovery times significantly and allowing human resources to focus on strategic cybersecurity tasks.

Science

The paper introduces a large language model-based agent that handles network incident response by integrating perception, reasoning, planning, and action within a single model. It leverages pre-trained knowledge and fine-tuning to process system logs, infer network states, simulate response strategies, and maintain in-context adaptation.

Method & Eval

The LLM agent was evaluated using historical incident logs and showed a 23% faster recovery time compared to current state-of-the-art LLMs, indicating significant improvement and potential for operational deployment.

Caveats

The model may still experience issues such as hallucinations or context loss, especially in unexpected scenarios, and depends heavily on pre-existing datasets and fine-tuning for effectiveness.

Author Intelligence

Yiran Gao

City University of Hong Kong
gaoyiran525@gmail.com

Kim Hammar

University of Melbourne
kim.hammar@unimelb.edu.au

Tao Li

City University of Hong Kong
li.tao@cityu.edu.hk

References (17)

[1]
Online Incident Response Planning under Model Misspecification through Bayesian Learning and Belief Quantization
2025Kim Hammar, Tao Li
[2]
Incident Response Planning Using a Lightweight Large Language Model with Reduced Hallucination
2025Kim Hammar, Tansu Alpcan et al.
[3]
Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities
2025Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber et al.
[4]
Leveraging Large Language Models for Autonomous Cyber Defense: Insights from CAGE-2 Simulations
2025Hamoun Mohammadi, Jonathan J. Davis et al.
[5]
Automated tactics planning for cyber attack and defense based on large language model agents
2025Yimo Ren, Jinfang Wang et al.
[6]
Large Language Models are Autonomous Cyber Defenders
2025Sebastián R. Castro, Roberto Campbell et al.
[7]
Design of an Autonomous Cyber Defence Agent using Hybrid AI models
2024Johannes F. Loevenich, Erik Adler et al.
[8]
Intrusion Tolerance for Networked Systems through Two-Level Feedback Control
2024K. Hammar, Rolf Stadler
[9]
Depending on yourself when you should: Mentoring LLM with RL agents to become the master in cybersecurity games
2024Yikuan Yan, Yaolun Zhang et al.
[10]
Symbiotic Game and Foundation Models for Cyber Deception Operations in Strategic Cyber Warfare
2024Tao Li, Quanyan Zhu
[11]
Conjectural Online Learning with First-order Beliefs in Asymmetric Information Stochastic Games
2024Tao Li, K. Hammar et al.
[12]
Introducing a New Alert Data Set for Multi-Step Attack Analysis
2023Max Landauer, Florian Skopik et al.
[13]
Scenario-Agnostic Zero-Trust Defense with Explainable Threshold Policy: A Meta-Learning Approach
2023Yunfei Ge, Tao Li et al.
[14]
Self-Adaptive Driving in Nonstationary Environments through Conjectural Online Lookahead Adaptation
2022Tao Li, Haozhe Lei et al.
[15]
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
2018Iman Sharafaldin, Arash Habibi Lashkari et al.
[16]
An empirical comparison of botnet detection methods
2014S. García, Martin Grill et al.
[17]
Game theory meets network security and privacy
2013M. Manshaei, Quanyan Zhu et al.