PDF Viewer

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

References (41)

[1]
TrustJudge: Inconsistencies of LLM-as-a-Judge and How to Alleviate Them
2025Yidong Wang, Yunze Song et al.
[2]
Generalised Probabilistic Modelling and Improved Uncertainty Estimation in Comparative LLM-as-a-judge
2025Yassir Fathullah, M. Gales
[3]
SkillAggregation: Reference-free LLM-Dependent Aggregation
2024Guangzhi Sun, Anmol Kagrecha et al.
[4]
From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline
2024Tianle Li, Wei-Lin Chiang et al.
[5]
Language Model Council: Democratically Benchmarking Foundation Models on Highly Subjective Tasks
2024Justin Zhao, F. Plaza-del-Arco et al.
[6]
LLM-RankFusion: Mitigating Intrinsic Inconsistency in LLM-based Ranking
2024Yifan Zeng, Ojas Tendolkar et al.
[7]
CrossCheckGPT: Universal Hallucination Ranking for Multimodal Foundation Models
2024Guangzhi Sun, Potsawee Manakul et al.
[8]
Efficient LLM Comparative Assessment: A Product of Experts Framework for Pairwise Comparisons
2024Adian Liusie, Vatsal Raina et al.
[9]
Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Models
2024Pat Verga, Sebastian Hofstätter et al.
[10]
PairEval: Open-domain Dialogue Evaluation with Pairwise Comparison
2024chaeHun Park, Minseok Choi et al.
[11]
Teacher-Student Training for Debiasing: General Permutation Debiasing for Large Language Models
2024Adian Liusie, Yassir Fathullah et al.
[12]
Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference
2024Wei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng et al.
[13]
MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues
2024Ge Bai, Jie Liu et al.
[14]
Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges
2024Zhen Li, Xiaohan Xu et al.
[15]
DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism
2024DeepSeek-AI Xiao Bi, Deli Chen et al.
[16]
Aligning with Logic: Measuring, Evaluating and Improving Logical Consistency in Large Language Models
2024Yinhong Liu, Zhijiang Guo et al.
[17]
Reference-Guided Verdict: LLMs-as-Judges in Automatic Evaluation of Free-Form Text
2024Sher Badshah, Hassan Sajjad
[18]
LLM Comparative Assessment: Zero-shot NLG Evaluation through Pairwise Comparisons using Large Language Models
2023Adian Liusie, Potsawee Manakul et al.
[19]
Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena
2023Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang et al.
[20]
Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators
2023Peiyi Wang, Lei Li et al.

Showing 20 of 41 references

Founder's Pitch

"Developing a more reliable AI jury system for evaluating natural language generation using a novel judge calibration method."

AI EvaluationScore: 6View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

2/4 signals

5

Quick Build

4/4 signals

10

Series A Potential

2/4 signals

5

Sources used for this analysis

arXiv Paper

Full-text PDF analysis of the research paper

GitHub Repository

Code availability, stars, and contributor activity

Citation Network

Semantic Scholar citations and co-citation patterns

Community Predictions

Crowd-sourced unicorn probability assessments

Analysis model: GPT-4o · Last scored: 2/18/2026

Explore the full citation network and related research.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Get detailed profiles of the research team.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.