View PDF ↗
PDF Viewer

Loading PDF...

This may take a moment

Open Full PDF

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Core Pattern

AI-generated implementation pattern based on this paper's core methodology.

Implementation pattern included in full analysis above.

MVP Investment

$9K - $12K
6-10 weeks
Engineering
$8,000
Cloud Hosting
$240
SaaS Stack
$300
Domain & Legal
$100

6mo ROI

2-4x

3yr ROI

10-20x

Lightweight AI tools can reach profitability quickly. At $500/mo average contract, 20 customers = $10K MRR by 6mo, 200+ by 3yr.

Talent Scout

M

Mohan Tang

UCLA

S

Sidi Lu

UCLA

Find Similar Experts

AI experts on LinkedIn & GitHub

Founder's Pitch

"TurboConn augments Transformers to significantly enhance reasoning capabilities without increased latency or extensive retraining resources."

AI ArchitecturesScore: 8View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

1/4 signals

2.5

Quick Build

4/4 signals

10

Series A Potential

4/4 signals

10

🔭 Research Neighborhood

Generating constellation...

~3-8 seconds

Why It Matters

This research addresses the fundamental limitation of transformer models in handling sequential reasoning tasks by enhancing the effective computational depth without increasing computational resources, thus opening doors for more efficient and powerful AI applications.

Product Angle

The modification can be integrated directly into existing large language models as a plug-in, allowing organizations to enhance their models' reasoning capabilities without significant increases in computational costs or retraining requirements.

Disruption

TurboConn has the potential to disrupt and replace iterative and computationally expensive hierarchical AI systems used in complex reasoning tasks, reducing the costs and increasing efficiency in deploying AI for real-time, complex reasoning.

Product Opportunity

There is a growing demand in industries that require sophisticated data analysis, such as financial services, pharmaceuticals, and AI-driven customer service, where enhanced reasoning can result in better operational efficiency and insights.

Use Case Idea

Enhance AI models in critical sectors such as finance or healthcare, where complex reasoning about large sequential data is required, thus improving decision-making processes significantly compared to current models.

Science

TurboConn modifies standard Transformer architectures by introducing downward connections from higher layers to lower layers, which allows the modeling of reasoning as an information flow from layer to layer, rather than just within a layer. This effectively increases the depth and capacity for reasoning within the model, as it enables previous outputs to inform the next tokens' layers, breaking the fixed-depth constraint.

Method & Eval

The method was evaluated on various reasoning-heavy datasets and showed a performance improvement over existing models, with accuracy increases up to 10% on benchmarks such as GSM8K, effectively verifying their enhanced reasoning abilities without additional latency or GPU costs.

Caveats

The main limitation is the loss of full parallelism during training, which might increase latency in sequential computations depending on specific applications. Efforts to adapt the model to diverse use cases will need careful group-size tuning for optimal performance.

Author Intelligence

Mohan Tang

LEAD
UCLA
tangmohanp@outlook.com

Sidi Lu

UCLA

References (25)

[1]
AceReason-Nemotron 1.1: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through SFT and RL Synergy
2025Zihan Liu, Zhuoling Yang et al.
[2]
Pretraining Language Models to Ponder in Continuous Space
2025Boyi Zeng, Shixiang Song et al.
[3]
Reasoning with Latent Thoughts: On the Power of Looped Transformers
2025Nikunj Saunshi, Nishanth Dikkala et al.
[4]
Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approach
2025Jonas Geiping, Sean McLeish et al.
[5]
AceMath: Advancing Frontier Math Reasoning with Post-Training and Reward Modeling
2024Zihan Liu, Yang Chen et al.
[6]
Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space
2024Shibo Hao, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar et al.
[7]
Looped Transformers for Length Generalization
2024Ying Fan, Yilun Du et al.
[8]
Hopping Too Late: Exploring the Limitations of Large Language Models on Multi-Hop Queries
2024Eden Biran, Daniela Gottesman et al.
[9]
Quiet-STaR: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Think Before Speaking
2024E. Zelikman, Georges Harik et al.
[10]
Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial Problems
2024Zhiyuan Li, Hong Liu et al.
[11]
The Expressive Power of Transformers with Chain of Thought
2024William Merrill, Ashish Sabharwal
[12]
Grokking of Implicit Reasoning in Transformers: A Mechanistic Journey to the Edge of Generalization
2024Boshi Wang, Xiang Yue et al.
[13]
Implicit Chain of Thought Reasoning via Knowledge Distillation
2023Yuntian Deng, K. Prasad et al.
[14]
MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuning
2023Xiang Yue, Xingwei Qu et al.
[15]
Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: a Theoretical Perspective
2023Guhao Feng, Yuntian Gu et al.
[16]
Looped Transformers as Programmable Computers
2023Angeliki Giannou, Shashank Rajput et al.
[17]
Solving Math Word Problems via Cooperative Reasoning induced Language Models
2022Xinyu Zhu, Junjie Wang et al.
[18]
The Parallelism Tradeoff: Limitations of Log-Precision Transformers
2022William Merrill, Ashish Sabharwal
[19]
Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners
2022Takeshi Kojima, S. Gu et al.
[20]
Chain of Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
2022Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang et al.

Showing 20 of 25 references