View PDF ↗
PDF Viewer

Loading PDF...

This may take a moment

Open Full PDF

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Core Pattern

AI-generated implementation pattern based on this paper's core methodology.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Founder's Pitch

"Develop a dual-scale validation framework for subjective continuous knowledge representation, particularly in political stance predictions."

Political AIScore: 3View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

0/4 signals

0

Quick Build

0/4 signals

0

Series A Potential

0/4 signals

0

Explore the full citation network and related research.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Get detailed profiles of the research team.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

References (35)

[1]
Rating Roulette: Self-Inconsistency in LLM-As-A-Judge Frameworks
2025Rajarshi Haldar, J. Hockenmaier
[2]
How to train your stochastic parrot: large language models for political texts
2025J. Ornstein, Elise N. Blasingame et al.
[3]
Beyond correlation: The impact of human uncertainty in measuring the effectiveness of automatic evaluation and LLM-as-a-judge
2024Aparna Elangovan, Jongwoo Ko et al.
[4]
Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Bias
2024Guiming Hardy Chen, Shunian Chen et al.
[5]
Positioning Political Texts with Large Language Models by Asking and Averaging
2023Gaël Le Mens, Aina Gallego
[6]
CMB: A Comprehensive Medical Benchmark in Chinese
2023Xidong Wang, Guiming Hardy Chen et al.
[7]
HuatuoGPT, towards Taming Language Model to Be a Doctor
2023Hongbo Zhang, Junying Chen et al.
[8]
Large Language Models Can Be Used to Estimate the Latent Positions of Politicians
2023Patrick Y. Wu, Joshua A. Tucker et al.
[9]
Fallacious Argument Classification in Political Debates
2022Pierpaolo Goffredo, Shohreh Haddadan et al.
[10]
Reliable visual analysis of single-case data: A comparison of rating, ranking, and pairwise methods
2021Kevin R. Tarlow, Daniel F. Brossart et al.
[11]
Argument Mining: A Survey
2020J. Lawrence, C. Reed
[12]
BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT
2019Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore et al.
[13]
Argumentation in the 2016 US presidential elections: annotated corpora of television debates and social media reaction
2019J. Visser, Barbara Konat et al.
[14]
Never Retreat, Never Retract: Argumentation Analysis for Political Speeches
2018Stefano Menini, Elena Cabrio et al.
[15]
Deep Reinforcement Learning from Human Preferences
2017P. Christiano, Jan Leike et al.
[16]
SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets
2016Saif M. Mohammad, Svetlana Kiritchenko et al.
[17]
Argument Mining from Speech: Detecting Claims in Political Debates
2016Marco Lippi, Paolo Torroni
[18]
Fast and Accurate Inference of Plackett-Luce Models
2015Lucas Maystre, Matthias Grossglauser
[19]
The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial
2014S. Modgil, H. Prakken
[20]
Measuring Ideological Proportions in Political Speeches
2013Yanchuan Sim, Brice D. L. Acree et al.

Showing 20 of 35 references