View PDF ↗
PDF Viewer

Loading PDF...

This may take a moment

Open Full PDF

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Core Pattern

AI-generated implementation pattern based on this paper's core methodology.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Founder's Pitch

"Develop a chatbot framework utilizing LLMs to analyze and classify student procedural questions in educational contexts."

Educational AIScore: 5View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

1/4 signals

2.5

Quick Build

3/4 signals

7.5

Series A Potential

0/4 signals

0

Explore the full citation network and related research.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Get detailed profiles of the research team.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

References (30)

[1]
How Students (Really) Use ChatGPT: Uncovering Experiences Among Undergraduate Students
2025Tawfiq Ammari, Meilun Chen et al.
[2]
Looking Beyond the Hype: Understanding the Effects of AI on Learning
2025Elisabeth Bauer, Samuel Greiff et al.
[3]
Formative Feedback on Engineering Self-Study: Towards 1 Million Times per Year per Cohort
2025Peter B. Johnson, Jon Fenton et al.
[4]
Understanding Learner-LLM Chatbot Interactions and the Impact of Prompting Guidelines
2025Cansu Koyuturk, Emily Theophilou et al.
[5]
Towards enhanced assessment question classification: a study using machine learning, deep learning, and generative AI
2025Mohammed Osman Gani, R. Ayyasamy et al.
[6]
The StudyChat Dataset: Student Dialogues With ChatGPT in an Artificial Intelligence Course
2025Hunter McNichols, Andrew Lan
[7]
What Should We Engineer in Prompts? Training Humans in Requirement-Driven LLM Use
2024Qianou Ma, Weirui Peng et al.
[8]
Analysis of LLMs for educational question classification and generation
2024Said al Faraby, Ade Romadhony et al.
[9]
How Do Students Interact with an LLM-powered Virtual Teaching Assistant in Different Educational Settings?
2024Pratyusha Maiti, Ashok K. Goel
[10]
LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Tasks
2024A. Bavaresco, Raffaella Bernardi et al.
[11]
The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic review
2024Chunpeng Zhai, Santoso Wibowo et al.
[12]
Towards Responsible Development of Generative AI for Education: An Evaluation-Driven Approach
2024Irina Jurenka, M. Kunesch et al.
[13]
The Kappa Paradox Explained.
2024B. M. Derksen, Wendy E. Bruinsma et al.
[14]
Role of AI chatbots in education: systematic literature review
2023Lasha Labadze, Maya Grigolia et al.
[15]
Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena
2023Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang et al.
[16]
Why Johnny Can’t Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts
2023J.D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong et al.
[17]
Can ChatGPT Detect Student Talk Moves in Classroom Discourse? A Preliminary Comparison with Bert
2023Deliang Wang, Dapeng Shan et al.
[18]
Are We There Yet? - A Systematic Literature Review on Chatbots in Education
2021S. Wollny, J. Schneider et al.
[19]
Controllable Open-ended Question Generation with A New Question Type Ontology
2021Shuyang Cao, Lu Wang
[20]
Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters
2014K. Gwet

Showing 20 of 30 references