View PDF ↗
PDF Viewer
Open Full PDF

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

References (43)

[1]
Monitoring Monitorability
2025Melody Y. Guan, Miles Wang et al.
[2]
Qwen3-VL Technical Report
2025Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai et al.
[3]
DR Tulu: Reinforcement Learning with Evolving Rubrics for Deep Research
2025Rulin Shao, Akari Asai et al.
[4]
AdvancedIF: Rubric-Based Benchmarking and Reinforcement Learning for Advancing LLM Instruction Following
2025Yun He, Wenzhe Li et al.
[5]
Stress Testing Deliberative Alignment for Anti-Scheming Training
2025Bronson Schoen, Evgenia Nitishinskaya et al.
[6]
Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety
2025Tomasz Korbak, Mikita Balesni et al.
[7]
One Token to Fool LLM-as-a-Judge
2025Yulai Zhao, Haolin Liu et al.
[8]
Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities
2025Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber et al.
[9]
Thought Crime: Backdoors and Emergent Misalignment in Reasoning Models
2025James Chua, Jan Betley et al.
[10]
LLMs Cannot Reliably Judge (Yet?): A Comprehensive Assessment on the Robustness of LLM-as-a-Judge
2025Songze Li, Chuokun Xu et al.
[11]
DPO Learning with LLMs-Judge Signal for Computer Use Agents
2025Man Luo, David Cobbley et al.
[12]
Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think
2025Yanda Chen, Joe Benton et al.
[13]
Process Reward Models That Think
2025Muhammad Khalifa, Rishabh Agarwal et al.
[14]
AgentRewardBench: Evaluating Automatic Evaluations of Web Agent Trajectories
2025Xing Han Lù, Amirhossein Kazemnejad et al.
[15]
Mixed Signals: Decoding VLMs' Reasoning and Underlying Bias in Vision-Language Conflict
2025Pouya Pezeshkpour, Moin Aminnaseri et al.
[16]
An Illusion of Progress? Assessing the Current State of Web Agents
2025Tianci Xue, Weijian Qi et al.
[17]
Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation
2025Bowen Baker, Joost Huizinga et al.
[18]
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful
2025Iv'an Arcuschin, Jett Janiak et al.
[19]
Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report
2025Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen et al.
[20]
Scaling Test-Time Compute Without Verification or RL is Suboptimal
2025Amrith Rajagopal Setlur, Nived Rajaraman et al.

Showing 20 of 43 references

Founder's Pitch

"A system that secures LLM-based judgements by verifying agent reasoning against observable evidence."

AI SecurityScore: 4View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

Breakdown pending for this paper.

Sources used for this analysis

arXiv Paper

Full-text PDF analysis of the research paper

GitHub Repository

Code availability, stars, and contributor activity

Citation Network

Semantic Scholar citations and co-citation patterns

Community Predictions

Crowd-sourced unicorn probability assessments

Analysis model: GPT-4o · Last scored: 1/21/2026

Explore the full citation network and related research.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Get detailed profiles of the research team.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.