PDF Viewer

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

References (31)

[1]
Strategies of cooperation and defection in five large language models
2026Saptarshi Pal, A. Mallela et al.
[2]
Strategic Communication and Language Bias in Multi-Agent LLM Coordination
2025Alessio Buscemi, Daniele Proverbio et al.
[3]
How large language models judge and influence human cooperation
2025Alexandre S. Pires, Laurens Samson et al.
[4]
Will Systems of LLM Agents Lead to Cooperation: An Investigation into a Social Dilemma
2025Richard Willis, Yali Du et al.
[5]
FAIRGAME: a Framework for AI Agents Bias Recognition using Game Theory
2025Alessio Buscemi, Daniele Proverbio et al.
[6]
Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agents
2025Alessio Buscemi, Daniele Proverbio et al.
[7]
Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI
2025Lewis Hammond, Alan Chan et al.
[8]
ALYMPICS: LLM Agents Meet Game Theory
2025Shaoguang Mao, Yuzhe Cai et al.
[9]
AI can help humans find common ground in democratic deliberation
2024Michael Henry Tessler, Michiel A. Bakker et al.
[10]
LLMs and generative agent-based models for complex systems research.
2024Yikang Lu, A. Aleta et al.
[11]
Strategic behavior of large language models and the role of game structure versus contextual framing
2024Nunzio Lorè, Babak Heydari
[12]
Nicer Than Humans: How do Large Language Models Behave in the Prisoner's Dilemma?
2024Nicoló Fontana, Francesco Pierri et al.
[13]
Can Large Language Models Serve as Rational Players in Game Theory? A Systematic Analysis
2023Caoyun Fan, Jindou Chen et al.
[14]
Playing repeated games with large language models
2023Elif Akata, L. Schulz et al.
[15]
Recognition of Behavioural Intention in Repeated Games using Machine Learning
2023Alessandro Di Stefano, Chrisina Jayne et al.
[16]
Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback
2022Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath et al.
[17]
Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback
2022Long Ouyang, Jeff Wu et al.
[18]
Inferring strategies from observations in long iterated Prisoner’s dilemma experiments
2022Eladio Montero-Porras, J. Grujić et al.
[19]
When to (or not to) trust intelligent machines: Insights from an evolutionary game theory analysis of trust in repeated games
2020H. Anh, Cédric Perret et al.
[20]
Functional dynamic by intention recognition in iterated games
2018Yuma Fujimoto, K. Kaneko

Showing 20 of 31 references

Founder's Pitch

"Auditing LLM strategies in social dilemmas for safer AI-agent interactions."

LLM StrategiesScore: 2View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

0/4 signals

0

Quick Build

0/4 signals

0

Series A Potential

0/4 signals

0

Sources used for this analysis

arXiv Paper

Full-text PDF analysis of the research paper

GitHub Repository

Code availability, stars, and contributor activity

Citation Network

Semantic Scholar citations and co-citation patterns

Community Predictions

Crowd-sourced unicorn probability assessments

Analysis model: GPT-4o · Last scored: 1/27/2026

Explore the full citation network and related research.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Get detailed profiles of the research team.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.