View PDF ↗
PDF Viewer
Open Full PDF

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

References (51)

[1]
From Entropy to Epiplexity: Rethinking Information for Computationally Bounded Intelligence
2026Marc Finzi, Shikai Qiu et al.
[2]
Wait, Wait, Wait... Why Do Reasoning Models Loop?
2025Charilaos Pipis, Shivam Garg et al.
[3]
The Art of Scaling Reinforcement Learning Compute for LLMs
2025Devvrit Khatri, Lovish Madaan et al.
[4]
Rethinking Thinking Tokens: LLMs as Improvement Operators
2025Lovish Madaan, A. Didolkar et al.
[5]
Part I: Tricks or Traps? A Deep Dive into RL for LLM Reasoning
2025Zihe Liu, Jiashun Liu et al.
[6]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs
2025Xumeng Wen, Zihan Liu et al.
[7]
TreeRL: LLM Reinforcement Learning with On-Policy Tree Search
2025Zhenyu Hou, Ziniu Hu et al.
[8]
e3: Learning to Explore Enables Extrapolation of Test-Time Compute for LLMs
2025Amrith Rajagopal Setlur, Matthew Y. R. Yang et al.
[9]
Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning
2025Shenzhi Wang, Le Yu et al.
[10]
Optimizing Anytime Reasoning via Budget Relative Policy Optimization
2025Penghui Qi, Zi-Yan Liu et al.
[11]
Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters
2024C. Snell, Jaehoon Lee et al.
[12]
Reasoning in Token Economies: Budget-Aware Evaluation of LLM Reasoning Strategies
2024Junlin Wang, Siddhartha Jain et al.
[13]
Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning
2024Yuxi Xie, Anirudh Goyal et al.
[14]
Quiet-STaR: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Think Before Speaking
2024E. Zelikman, Georges Harik et al.
[15]
DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
2024Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang et al.
[16]
Self-Rewarding Language Models
2024Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang et al.
[17]
Model-Free Robust φ-Divergence Reinforcement Learning Using Both Offline and Online Data
2024Kishan Panaganti, Adam Wierman et al.
[18]
Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations
2023Peiyi Wang, Lei Li et al.
[19]
Near-Optimal Algorithms for Group Distributionally Robust Optimization and Beyond
2022Tasuku Soma, Khashayar Gatmiry et al.
[20]
Robust Reinforcement Learning using Offline Data
2022Kishan Panaganti, Zaiyan Xu et al.

Showing 20 of 51 references

Founder's Pitch

"Enhance LLM reasoning by dynamically optimizing training distributions with Multi-Adversary GDRO framework."

LLM TrainingScore: 5View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

1/4 signals

2.5

Quick Build

1/4 signals

2.5

Series A Potential

2/4 signals

5

Sources used for this analysis

arXiv Paper

Full-text PDF analysis of the research paper

GitHub Repository

Code availability, stars, and contributor activity

Citation Network

Semantic Scholar citations and co-citation patterns

Community Predictions

Crowd-sourced unicorn probability assessments

Analysis model: GPT-4o · Last scored: 1/27/2026

Explore the full citation network and related research.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Get detailed profiles of the research team.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.