View PDF ↗
PDF Viewer
Open Full PDF

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

References (63)

[1]
OpenAI GPT-5 System Card
2025Aaditya K. Singh, Adam Fry et al.
[2]
Weight Decay may matter more than muP for Learning Rate Transfer in Practice
2025Atli Kosson, Jeremy Welborn et al.
[3]
Training Dynamics Impact Post-Training Quantization Robustness
2025Albert Catalan-Tatjer, Niccolo Ajroldi et al.
[4]
Train Once, Answer All: Many Pretraining Experiments for the Cost of One
2025Sebastian Bordt, Martin Pawelczyk
[5]
Pre-training under infinite compute
2025Konwoo Kim, Suhas Kotha et al.
[6]
Fantastic Pretraining Optimizers and Where to Find Them
2025Kaiyue Wen, D. Hall et al.
[7]
Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities
2025Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber et al.
[8]
EvoLM: In Search of Lost Language Model Training Dynamics
2025Zhenting Qi, Fan Nie et al.
[9]
One Tokenizer To Rule Them All: Emergent Language Plasticity via Multilingual Tokenizers
2025Diana Abagyan, Alejandro Salamanca et al.
[10]
Investigating the Role of Weight Decay in Enhancing Nonconvex SGD
2025Tao Sun, Yuhao Huang et al.
[11]
Power Lines: Scaling Laws for Weight Decay and Batch Size in LLM Pre-training
2025Shane Bergsma, Nolan Dey et al.
[12]
LLMs on the Line: Data Determines Loss-to-Loss Scaling Laws
2025Prasanna Mayilvahanan, Thaddäus Wiedemer et al.
[13]
Do Large Language Model Benchmarks Test Reliability?
2025Joshua Vendrow, Edward Vendrow et al.
[14]
s1: Simple test-time scaling
2025Niklas Muennighoff, Zitong Yang et al.
[15]
TÜLU 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training
2024Nathan Lambert, Jacob Daniel Morrison et al.
[16]
Plasticity Loss in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
2024Timo Klein, Lukas Miklautz et al.
[17]
Weight decay induces low-rank attention layers
2024Seijin Kobayashi, Yassir Akram et al.
[18]
How Does Critical Batch Size Scale in Pre-training?
2024Hanlin Zhang, Depen Morwani et al.
[19]
Wide Neural Networks Trained with Weight Decay Provably Exhibit Neural Collapse
2024Arthur Jacot, Peter S'uken'ik et al.
[20]
How much can we forget about Data Contamination?
2024Sebastian Bordt, Suraj Srinivas et al.

Showing 20 of 63 references

Founder's Pitch

"Optimize language model hyperparameters to enhance downstream task adaptability by focusing on weight decay's role in plasticity."

LLM TrainingScore: 4View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

1/4 signals

2.5

Quick Build

2/4 signals

5

Series A Potential

1/4 signals

2.5

Sources used for this analysis

arXiv Paper

Full-text PDF analysis of the research paper

GitHub Repository

Code availability, stars, and contributor activity

Citation Network

Semantic Scholar citations and co-citation patterns

Community Predictions

Crowd-sourced unicorn probability assessments

Analysis model: GPT-4o · Last scored: 2/11/2026

Explore the full citation network and related research.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Get detailed profiles of the research team.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.