View PDF ↗
PDF Viewer
Open Full PDF

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

References (34)

[1]
DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models
2025DeepSeek-AI, A. Liu et al.
[2]
Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarks
2025Andrew M. Bean, R. Kearns et al.
[3]
Who is a Better Player: LLM against LLM
2025Yingjie Zhou, Jiezhang Cao et al.
[4]
MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitions
2025Mislav Balunovi'c, Jasper Dekoninck et al.
[5]
Lost in Benchmarks? Rethinking Large Language Model Benchmarking with Item Response Theory
2025Hongli Zhou, Hui Huang et al.
[6]
ZeroSumEval: Scaling LLM Evaluation with Inter-Model Competition
2025Haidar Khan, Meta Hisham et al.
[7]
YourBench: Easy Custom Evaluation Sets for Everyone
2025Sumuk Shashidhar, Clémentine Fourrier et al.
[8]
Reliable and Efficient Amortized Model-based Evaluation
2025Sang T. Truong, Yuheng Tu et al.
[9]
Humanity's Last Exam
2025Long Phan, Alice Gatti et al.
[10]
Phi-4 Technical Report
2024Marah Abdin, J. Aneja et al.
[11]
FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AI
2024Elliot Glazer, Ege Erdil et al.
[12]
Evaluation data contamination in LLMs: how do we measure it and (when) does it matter?
2024Aaditya K. Singh, Muhammed Yusuf Kocyigit et al.
[13]
On scalable oversight with weak LLMs judging strong LLMs
2024Zachary Kenton, Noah Y. Siegel et al.
[14]
Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluators
2024Yann Dubois, Bal'azs Galambosi et al.
[15]
Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context
2024Machel Reid, Nikolay Savinov et al.
[16]
Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference
2024Wei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng et al.
[17]
OpenAI o1 System Card
2024Ahmed El-Kishky
[18]
ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate
2023Chi-Min Chan, Weize Chen et al.
[19]
LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Models
2023Kaiyu Yang, Aidan M. Swope et al.
[20]
Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena
2023Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang et al.

Showing 20 of 34 references

Founder's Pitch

"Develop an adversarial benchmarking framework for LLMs to ensure evaluation integrity beyond human comprehension."

BenchmarkingScore: 5View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

1/4 signals

2.5

Quick Build

1/4 signals

2.5

Series A Potential

1/4 signals

2.5

Sources used for this analysis

arXiv Paper

Full-text PDF analysis of the research paper

GitHub Repository

Code availability, stars, and contributor activity

Citation Network

Semantic Scholar citations and co-citation patterns

Community Predictions

Crowd-sourced unicorn probability assessments

Analysis model: GPT-4o · Last scored: 2/15/2026

Explore the full citation network and related research.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Get detailed profiles of the research team.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.