View PDF ↗
PDF Viewer
Open Full PDF

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

References (33)

[1]
A brain-inspired agentic architecture to improve planning with LLMs
2025Taylor W. Webb, S. S. Mondal et al.
[2]
Prospect Theory Fails for LLMs: Revealing Instability of Decision-Making under Epistemic Uncertainty
2025Rui Wang, Qihan Lin et al.
[3]
A Comprehensive Analysis of Large Language Model Outputs: Similarity, Diversity, and Bias
2025Brandon Smith, Mohamed Reda Bouadjenek et al.
[4]
LLM Agents Display Human Biases but Exhibit Distinct Learning Patterns
2025Idan Horowitz, Ori Plonsky
[5]
Evaluating and Aligning Human Economic Risk Preferences in LLMs
2025Jiaxin Liu, Yi Yang et al.
[6]
A Review of Large Language Models in Medical Education, Clinical Decision Support, and Healthcare Administration
2025J. Vrdoljak, Zvonimir Boban et al.
[7]
Agentic Workflows for Improving Large Language Model Reasoning in Robotic Object-Centered Planning
2025Jesús Moncada-Ramírez, José Luis Matez-Bandera et al.
[8]
Strategic behavior of large language models and the role of game structure versus contextual framing
2024Nunzio Lorè, Babak Heydari
[9]
LLM economicus? Mapping the Behavioral Biases of LLMs via Utility Theory
2024Jillian Ross, Yoon Kim et al.
[10]
Decision-Making Behavior Evaluation Framework for LLMs under Uncertain Context
2024Jingru Jia, Zehua Yuan et al.
[11]
Towards Rationality in Language and Multimodal Agents: A Survey
2024Bowen Jiang, Yangxinyu Xie et al.
[12]
Understanding Emergent Abilities of Language Models from the Loss Perspective
2024Zhengxiao Du, Aohan Zeng et al.
[13]
Can Large Language Models Serve as Rational Players in Game Theory? A Systematic Analysis
2023Caoyun Fan, Jindou Chen et al.
[14]
Leveraging Large Language Models for Decision Support in Personalized Oncology
2023M. Benary, Xing David Wang et al.
[15]
EconAgent: Large Language Model-Empowered Agents for Simulating Macroeconomic Activities
2023Nian Li, Chen Gao et al.
[16]
Playing repeated games with large language models
2023Elif Akata, L. Schulz et al.
[17]
The emergence of economic rationality of GPT
2023Yiting Chen, T. Liu et al.
[18]
Can AI language models replace human participants?
2023Danica Dillion, Niket Tandon et al.
[19]
Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
2023J. Park, Joseph C. O’Brien et al.
[20]
Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples
2022Lisa P. Argyle, E. Busby et al.

Showing 20 of 33 references

Founder's Pitch

"Study contrasts reasoning and conversational LLM behaviors under uncertainty."

LLM EvaluationScore: 2View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

0/4 signals

0

Quick Build

1/4 signals

2.5

Series A Potential

0/4 signals

0

Sources used for this analysis

arXiv Paper

Full-text PDF analysis of the research paper

GitHub Repository

Code availability, stars, and contributor activity

Citation Network

Semantic Scholar citations and co-citation patterns

Community Predictions

Crowd-sourced unicorn probability assessments

Analysis model: GPT-4o · Last scored: 2/16/2026

Explore the full citation network and related research.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Get detailed profiles of the research team.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.