PDF Viewer

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

MVP Investment

$9K - $13K
6-10 weeks
Engineering
$8,000
Cloud Hosting
$240
LLM API Credits
$500
SaaS Stack
$300
Domain & Legal
$100

6mo ROI

1-2x

3yr ROI

10-25x

Automation tools have long sales cycles but high retention. Expect $5K MRR by 6mo, accelerating to $500K+ ARR at 3yr as enterprises adopt.

Talent Scout

T

Tanqiu Jiang

Stony Brook University

Y

Yuhui Wang

Stony Brook University

J

Jiacheng Liang

Stony Brook University

T

Ting Wang

Stony Brook University

Find Similar Experts

Agents experts on LinkedIn & GitHub

References (37)

[1]
Scaling Medical Reasoning Verification via Tool-Integrated Reinforcement Learning
2026Hang Zhang, Ruheng Wang et al.
[2]
DLRREC: Denoising Latent Representations via Multi-Modal Knowledge Fusion in Deep Recommender Systems
2025Jiahao Tian, Zhenkai Wang
[3]
Optimal Hovering Control Strategy for UAVs Using PPO
2025Yutong Luo, Jianing Xu et al.
[4]
The Attacker Moves Second: Stronger Adaptive Attacks Bypass Defenses Against Llm Jailbreaks and Prompt Injections
2025Milad Nasr, Nicholas Carlini et al.
[5]
RL Is a Hammer and LLMs Are Nails: A Simple Reinforcement Learning Recipe for Strong Prompt Injection
2025Yuxin Wen, Arman Zharmagambetov et al.
[6]
STAC: When Innocent Tools Form Dangerous Chains to Jailbreak LLM Agents
2025Jing-Jing Li, Jianfeng He et al.
[7]
Reasoning or Retrieval? A Study of Answer Attribution on Large Reasoning Models
2025Yuhui Wang, Changjiang Li et al.
[8]
ChatInject: Abusing Chat Templates for Prompt Injection in LLM Agents
2025Hwan Chang, Yonghyun Jun et al.
[9]
Energy-Constrained Motion Planning and Scheduling for Autonomous Robots in Complex Environments
2025Zhichao Ma, Aijia Sun et al.
[10]
SHADE-Arena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in LLM Agents
2025Jonathan Kutasov, Yuqi Sun et al.
[11]
Prompt Injection Attack to Tool Selection in LLM Agents
2025Jiawen Shi, Zenghui Yuan et al.
[12]
Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory
2025P. Chhikara, Dev Khant et al.
[13]
WASP: Benchmarking Web Agent Security Against Prompt Injection Attacks
2025Ivan Evtimov, Arman Zharmagambetov et al.
[14]
X-Teaming: Multi-Turn Jailbreaks and Defenses with Adaptive Multi-Agents
2025Salman Rahman, Liwei Jiang et al.
[15]
CountLLM: Towards Generalizable Repetitive Action Counting via Large Language Model
2025Ziyu Yao, Xuxin Cheng et al.
[16]
Memory Injection Attacks on LLM Agents via Query-Only Interaction
2025Shen Dong, Shaochen Xu et al.
[17]
Optimizing generative AI by backpropagating language model feedback
2025Mert Yuksekgonul, Federico Bianchi et al.
[18]
UDora: A Unified Red Teaming Framework against LLM Agents by Dynamically Hijacking Their Own Reasoning
2025Jiawei Zhang, Shuang Yang et al.
[19]
A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agents
2025Wujiang Xu, Zujie Liang et al.
[20]
Towards Safe AI Clinicians: A Comprehensive Study on Large Language Model Jailbreaking in Healthcare
2025Hang Zhang, Qian Lou et al.

Showing 20 of 37 references

Founder's Pitch

"AgentLAB provides the first benchmark for evaluating and improving the security of LLM agents against complex, long-horizon attacks."

AgentsScore: 5View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

1/4 signals

2.5

Quick Build

4/4 signals

10

Series A Potential

4/4 signals

10

Sources used for this analysis

arXiv Paper

Full-text PDF analysis of the research paper

GitHub Repository

Code availability, stars, and contributor activity

Citation Network

Semantic Scholar citations and co-citation patterns

Community Predictions

Crowd-sourced unicorn probability assessments

Analysis model: GPT-4o · Last scored: 2/18/2026

🔭 Research Neighborhood

Generating constellation...

~3-8 seconds

Why It Matters

The research introduces the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the security of LLM agents against long-horizon attacks, which are increasingly relevant as LLM agents are deployed in complex, multi-step environments. This is crucial as it identifies vulnerabilities that short-lived attacks cannot exploit, thereby improving the robustness of AI applications in sensitive areas.

Product Angle

Productize AgentLAB as a subscription-based AI security assessment platform offering continuous integration with development pipelines for proactive security testing of LLM applications against evolving threats.

Disruption

AgentLAB could replace traditional AI security assessments which predominantly focus on immediate or short-lived vulnerabilities, offering a more nuanced understanding of potential threats over extended interactions.

Product Opportunity

The market potential is significant as industries rely more on LLMs for automation, risking exposure to complex attacks. Security-conscious sectors like finance, healthcare, and IoT can tap into this solution for safeguarding their AI systems.

Use Case Idea

A commercial product could focus on cybersecurity firms and AI developers needing robust testing environments to assess the resilience of their LLM-powered applications against prolonged adversarial attacks.

Science

AgentLAB provides a structured framework to evaluate the susceptibility of LLM agents to long-term adversarial strategies across realistic scenarios. By simulating long-horizon attacks such as intent hijacking, tool chaining, and others, it allows for thorough testing of security measures beyond traditional single-turn defenses.

Method & Eval

The paper details the development of 644 test cases across 28 environments with five types of long-horizon attacks. Benchmarking includes existing LLM agents demonstrating the gap in current defense measures for multi-turn attacks.

Caveats

The methodology could face challenges in generalizing across highly distinct systems and environments not simulated within the benchmark. Additionally, rapid advancements in LLM capabilities might outpace the benchmark's current configurations.

Author Intelligence

Tanqiu Jiang

Stony Brook University

Yuhui Wang

Stony Brook University

Jiacheng Liang

Stony Brook University

Ting Wang

Stony Brook University
twang@cs.stonybrook.edu