View PDF ↗
PDF Viewer
Open Full PDF

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Estimated $9K - $13K over 6-10 weeks.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

References (28)

[1]
Preference-Based Learning in Audio Applications: A Systematic Analysis
2025Aaron Broukhim, Yiran Shen et al.
[2]
Step-Audio: Unified Understanding and Generation in Intelligent Speech Interaction
2025Ailin Huang, Boyong Wu et al.
[3]
Speechworthy Instruction-tuned Language Models
2024Hyundong Justin Cho, Nic Jedema et al.
[4]
Emo-DPO: Controllable Emotional Speech Synthesis through Direct Preference Optimization
2024Xiaoxue Gao, Chen Zhang et al.
[5]
LLaMA-Omni: Seamless Speech Interaction with Large Language Models
2024Qingkai Fang, Shoutao Guo et al.
[6]
Qwen2-Audio Technical Report
2024Yunfei Chu, Jin Xu et al.
[7]
Believing Anthropomorphism: Examining the Role of Anthropomorphic Cues on Trust in Large Language Models
2024Michelle Cohn, Mahima Pushkarna et al.
[8]
The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Models
2024Hannah Rose Kirk, Alexander Whitefield et al.
[9]
RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
2024Shreyas Chaudhari, Pranjal Aggarwal et al.
[10]
SpeechAlign: Aligning Speech Generation to Human Preferences
2024Dong Zhang, Zhaowei Li et al.
[11]
MusicRL: Aligning Music Generation to Human Preferences
2024Geoffrey Cideron, Sertan Girgin et al.
[12]
Loose lips sink ships: Mitigating Length Bias in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
2023Wei Shen, Rui Zheng et al.
[13]
A Long Way to Go: Investigating Length Correlations in RLHF
2023Prasann Singhal, Tanya Goyal et al.
[14]
RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback
2023Harrison Lee, Samrat Phatale et al.
[15]
Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena
2023Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang et al.
[16]
Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training
2023Zeqiu Wu, Yushi Hu et al.
[17]
Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators
2023Peiyi Wang, Lei Li et al.
[18]
Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization
2022Leo Gao, John Schulman et al.
[19]
Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
2022Yuntao Bai, Andy Jones et al.
[20]
Learning to summarize from human feedback
2020Nisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang et al.

Showing 20 of 28 references

Founder's Pitch

"Exploring the effects of modality on preference alignment to improve AI systems' adherence to human judgments."

AI AlignmentScore: 3View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

0/4 signals

0

Quick Build

0/4 signals

0

Series A Potential

0/4 signals

0

Sources used for this analysis

arXiv Paper

Full-text PDF analysis of the research paper

GitHub Repository

Code availability, stars, and contributor activity

Citation Network

Semantic Scholar citations and co-citation patterns

Community Predictions

Crowd-sourced unicorn probability assessments

Analysis model: GPT-4o · Last scored: 2/26/2026

Explore the full citation network and related research.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Get detailed profiles of the research team.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.