Thinking to Recall: How Reasoning Unlocks Parametric Knowledge in LLMs

PDF Viewer

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

References (35)

[1]
Improving Parametric Knowledge Access in Reasoning Language Models
2026Melody Ma, John Hewitt
[2]
Empty Shelves or Lost Keys? Recall Is the Bottleneck for Parametric Factuality
2026Nitay Calderon, Eyal Ben-David et al.
[3]
What Characterizes Effective Reasoning? Revisiting Length, Review, and Structure of CoT
2025Yunzhen Feng, Julia Kempe et al.
[4]
SimpleQA Verified: A Reliable Factuality Benchmark to Measure Parametric Knowledge
2025Lukas Haas, G. Yona et al.
[5]
Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities
2025Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber et al.
[6]
How Well Can Reasoning Models Identify and Recover from Unhelpful Thoughts?
2025Sohee Yang, Sang-Woo Lee et al.
[7]
Rewarding the Unlikely: Lifting GRPO Beyond Distribution Sharpening
2025Andre He, Daniel Fried et al.
[8]
Don't Overthink it. Preferring Shorter Thinking Chains for Improved LLM Reasoning
2025Michael Hassid, Gabriel Synnaeve et al.
[9]
Beyond Semantics: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Reasonless Intermediate Tokens
2025Kaya Stechly, Karthik Valmeekam et al.
[10]
Qwen3 Technical Report
2025An Yang, Anfeng Li et al.
[11]
Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think
2025Yanda Chen, Joe Benton et al.
[12]
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful
2025Iv'an Arcuschin, Jett Janiak et al.
[13]
Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRs
2025K. Gandhi, Ayush K Chakravarthy et al.
[14]
Towards Thinking-Optimal Scaling of Test-Time Compute for LLM Reasoning
2025Wenkai Yang, Shuming Ma et al.
[15]
When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMs
2025Yuyang Wu, Yifei Wang et al.
[16]
s1: Simple test-time scaling
2025Niklas Muennighoff, Zitong Yang et al.
[17]
DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
2025Adam Suma, Sam Dauncey
[18]
Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally Can be More Effective than Scaling Parameters for Reasoning
2025C. Snell, Jaehoon Lee et al.
[19]
TÜLU 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training
2024Nathan Lambert, Jacob Daniel Morrison et al.
[20]
Measuring short-form factuality in large language models
2024Jason Wei, Nguyen Karina et al.

Showing 20 of 35 references

Founder's Pitch

"Unlocking reasoning in LLMs enhances parametric knowledge recall for improved accuracy."

LLM ReasoningScore: 5View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

1/4 signals

2.5

Quick Build

0/4 signals

0

Series A Potential

0/4 signals

0

Sources used for this analysis

arXiv Paper

Full-text PDF analysis of the research paper

GitHub Repository

Code availability, stars, and contributor activity

Citation Network

Semantic Scholar citations and co-citation patterns

Community Predictions

Crowd-sourced unicorn probability assessments

Analysis model: GPT-4o · Last scored: 3/10/2026

Explore the full citation network and related research.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Get detailed profiles of the research team.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Related Papers

Loading…