From Entropy to Calibrated Uncertainty: Training Language Models to Reason About Uncertainty

PDF Viewer

BUILDER'S SANDBOX

Build This Paper

Use an AI coding agent to implement this research.

OpenAI Codex
OpenAI CodexAI Agent

Lightweight coding agent in your terminal.

Claude Code
Claude CodeAI Agent

Agentic coding tool for terminal workflows.

AntiGravity IDE
AntiGravity IDEScaffolding

AI agent mindset installer and workflow scaffolder.

Cursor
CursorIDE

AI-first code editor built on VS Code.

VS Code
VS CodeIDE

Free, open-source editor by Microsoft.

Estimated $10K - $14K over 6-10 weeks.

See exactly what it costs to build this -- with 3 comparable funded startups.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Discover the researchers behind this paper and find similar experts.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

References (25)

[1]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs
2025Xumeng Wen, Zihan Liu et al.
[2]
Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Model
2025Jingcheng Hu, Yinmin Zhang et al.
[3]
Rewarding Doubt: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Calibrated Confidence Expression of Large Language Models
2025David Bani-Harouni, Chantal Pellegrini et al.
[4]
Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertainty
2025Mehul Damani, Isha Puri et al.
[5]
On Verbalized Confidence Scores for LLMs
2024Daniel Yang, Yao-Hung Tsai et al.
[6]
Large language models in medical and healthcare fields: applications, advances, and challenges
2024Dandan Wang, Shiqing Zhang
[7]
MAGDA: Multi-agent Guideline-Driven Diagnostic Assistance
2024David Bani-Harouni, Nassir Navab et al.
[8]
Detecting hallucinations in large language models using semantic entropy
2024Sebastian Farquhar, Jannik Kossen et al.
[9]
Kernel Language Entropy: Fine-grained Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs from Semantic Similarities
2024Alexander Nikitin, Jannik Kossen et al.
[10]
DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
2024Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang et al.
[11]
Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs
2023Miao Xiong, Zhiyuan Hu et al.
[12]
GPT-4 Technical Report
2023OpenAI Josh Achiam, Steven Adler et al.
[13]
LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
2023Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril et al.
[14]
Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know
2022Saurav Kadavath, Tom Conerly et al.
[15]
Chain of Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
2022Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang et al.
[16]
Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems
2021K. Cobbe, Vineet Kosaraju et al.
[17]
AI in Finance: Challenges, Techniques, and Opportunities
2021Longbing Cao
[18]
How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence
2020Haoxiang Zhong, Chaojun Xiao et al.
[19]
Natural Questions: A Benchmark for Question Answering Research
2019T. Kwiatkowski, J. Palomaki et al.
[20]
Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: New Edition
2018J. Neumann

Showing 20 of 25 references

Founder's Pitch

"Develop a pipeline to efficiently infer calibrated uncertainty estimates in LLMs for high-stakes domains."

LLM CalibrationScore: 3View PDF ↗

Commercial Viability Breakdown

0-10 scale

High Potential

1/4 signals

2.5

Quick Build

2/4 signals

5

Series A Potential

0/4 signals

0

Sources used for this analysis

arXiv Paper

Full-text PDF analysis of the research paper

GitHub Repository

Code availability, stars, and contributor activity

Citation Network

Semantic Scholar citations and co-citation patterns

Community Predictions

Crowd-sourced unicorn probability assessments

Analysis model: GPT-4o · Last scored: 3/6/2026

Explore the full citation network and related research.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Understand the commercial significance and market impact.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Get detailed profiles of the research team.

7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.

Related Papers

Loading…